5 April 2018
Take note of recent Case Law
Keeping Kids Company (in compulsory liquidation) v Smith and othersOn 5 August 2015, the charity closed, dismissing all staff by reason of redundancy. Although the restructure plans had envisaged a process of consultation, this had not happened.
A number of employees brought a tribunal claim for protective awards under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A). Under s.188 of TULR(C)A, an employer must consult appropriate representatives of the employees if it is proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days or less.
The EAT held that the tribunal had been entitled to find that its collective consultation duties were triggered on 12 June 2015, when there was a proposal that could affect all employees. The EAT found that there had been a clear, but provisional, intention to dismiss for redundancy, not limited to particular categories of employee.
Agreeing with the tribunal, the EAT rejected the charity's argument that the dismissals, which took place in August 2015, were different to the dismissals proposed in the 12 June business plan. Therefore the fact that the redundancies which were actually carried out were less than 20 this did not remove their responsibility to collectively consult.
Disability Discrimination
Lofty v. Hamis
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that ‘cancer' for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 includes pre-cancerous lesions, as it upheld the unfair dismissal appeal of a woman who suffered from a lesion that could have become malignant.
The EAT considered the definition of a ‘disabled' person under the Equality Act.
Lofty had been diagnosed as suffering from lentigo maligna, described as a pre-cancerous lesion that could result in lesion malignant melanoma (skin cancer). Lofty worked as a café assistant, and she was dismissed for taking time off from work while suffering from this condition.
She told the EAT: "Had my condition been left untreated, without surgery or medical intervention, it is highly likely that it would have invaded the healthy cells outside the epidermis and more aggressive cancer treatments such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy would have been required.
At the time of her dismissal, Lofty had undergone successful surgery to remove cancer cells from her face before they had the chance to spread to the rest of her body.
The EAT found that the relevant point of determination of a disability, in this case cancer, is at diagnosis, not after treatment.
Intergraf Economic News (Paper Prices) - March 2024
18 March 2024
Access the latest edition of the Economic Newsletter for the European Printing Industry for data on paper consumption, and pricing data for pulp, paper and recovered paper. Data for packaging papers and board is also available with this edition.
STUDY EXPOSES HIGH COST OF PHARMACIES PRINTING MEDICAL INFORMATION LEAFLETS
7 March 2024
Intergraf welcomes the release of a study by our partner MLPS (Medical Leaflet = Patient Safety), a subgroup of the European Carton Manufacturers Association (ECMA) shedding light on the potential economic costs associated with the proposed use of Print on Demand (PoD) leaflets in the pharmaceutical legislation revision.
The BPIF is the printing industries champion. By becoming a member you join a diverse and influential community. We help you solve business problems, connect you to new customers and suppliers and make your voice heard in government.
Call 01676 526030